Topic 4: Statistical Analysis

Want create site? With you can do it easy.

NRS 423 Topic 4: Statistical Analysis

Topic 4: Statistical Analysis

Quality Improvement Proposal

Identify a quality improvement opportunity in your organization or practice. In a 1,250-1,500 word paper, describe the problem or issue and propose a quality improvement initiative based on evidence-based practice. Apply “The Road to Evidence-Based Practice” process, illustrated in Chapter 4 of your textbook, to create your proposal.

Struggling to find relevant content or pressed for time? – Don’t worry, we have a team of professionals to help you on
Topic 4: Statistical Analysis
Get a 15% Discount on this Paper
Order Now

Include the following:

  1. Provide an overview of the problem and the setting in which the problem or issue occurs.
  2. Explain why a quality improvement initiative is needed in this area and the expected outcome.
  3. Discuss how the results of previous research demonstrate support for the quality improvement initiative and its projected outcomes. Include a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years, not included in the course materials or textbook, that establish evidence in support of the quality improvement proposed.
  4. Discuss steps necessary to implement the quality improvement initiative. Provide evidence and rationale to support your answer.
  5. Explain how the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated to determine whether there was improvement.
  6. Support your explanation by identifying the variables, hypothesis test, and statistical test that you would need to prove that the quality improvement initiative succeeded.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the  for assistance.

Topic 4 DQ 1

Provide an example of experimental, quasi-experimental, and nonexperimental research from the GCU Library and explain how each research type differs from the others. When replying to peers, evaluate the effectiveness of the research design of the study for two of the examples provided.

Topic 4 DQ 2

Describe the difference between research and quality improvement. Provide a workplace example where qualitative and quantitative research is applied and how it was used within your organization. When replying to peers, discuss how these research findings might be incorporated into another health care setting.

Quality Improvement Proposal

No of Criteria11 Achievement Levels: 5
Criteria
Achievement Levels
Description
Percentage
1: Unsatisfactory
0.00 %
2: Less Than Satisfactory
65.00 %
3: Satisfactory
75.00 %
4: Good
85.00 %
5: Excellent
100.00 %
Content
70.0
Problem or Issue in Practice or Organization
5.0
Overview of the problem and the setting in which the problem or issue occurs is not described.
Overview of the problem and the setting in which the problem or issue occurs is partially described. More information is needed to fully understand the problem and the scope of the organization or practice.
Overview of the problem and the setting in which the problem or issue occurs is summarized. Some information is needed to fully understand the problem or the scope of the organization or practice.
Overview of the problem and the setting in which the problem or issue occurs is described. Some detail is need for clarity.
Overview of the problem and the setting in which the problem or issue occurs is described in detail.
Significance of Quality Improvement in Practice or Organization
10.0
Explanation of why the quality improvement initiative is needed is omitted.
Explanation of why the quality improvement initiative is needed is partially presented. More information is needed to understand why the quality improvement is relevant to the problem or setting. The expected outcome is unclear.
Explanation of why the quality improvement initiative is needed is summarized. Some information is needed to understand why the quality improvement is relevant to the problem or setting. The expected outcome is generally presented.
Explanation of why the quality improvement initiative is needed is discussed. It appears that the quality improvement initiative would help address the problem within the described setting. The expected outcome is described. Some information or rationale is needed for support or clarity.
Explanation of why the quality improvement initiative is need is clearly discussed. The quality improvement initiative would help address the problem within the described setting presented. The expected outcome is thoroughly described. Overall, the explanation is clear and well supported.
Demonstration of Support From Previous Research
15.0
The use of research to demonstrate support for the quality improvement initiative and its projected outcomes is omitted. Three peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years are omitted.
The use of research to demonstrate support for the quality improvement initiative and its projected outcomes is incomplete. Overall, the research results do not demonstrate support for the initiative or projected outcomes. Fewer than three peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years were used.
The use of research to demonstrate support for the quality improvement initiative and its projected outcomes is generally presented. The research results generally demonstrate support for the initiative and projected outcomes. Three peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years were used.
The use of research to demonstrate support for the quality improvement initiative and its projected outcomes is presented. The research results demonstrate support for the initiative and projected outcomes. The three peer-reviewed sources meet all assignment criteria.
The use of research to demonstrate support for the quality improvement initiative and its projected outcomes is clearly presented. The research results strongly demonstrate support for the initiative and projected outcomes. The three peer-reviewed sources meet all assignment criteria and provide critical support for the initiative.
Steps Necessary to Implement Quality Improvement Initiative
15.0
The steps necessary to implement the quality improvement initiative are omitted.
The steps necessary to implement the quality improvement initiative are incomplete. It is unclear how the steps presented will lead to implementation. More information is needed.
The steps necessary to implement the quality improvement initiative are summarized. Some steps are vague. More evidence or rationale is needed for support.
The steps necessary to implement the quality improvement initiative are discussed. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support or clarity.
The steps necessary to implement the quality improvement initiative are thoroughly discussed. The implantation steps are well supported with evidence and rationale.
Evaluation of Quality Improvement
15.0
An explanation for how the quality improvement initiative will be measured is omitted.
An explanation for how the quality improvement initiative will be measured is partially presented. It is unclear how the evaluation will measure improvement; or it is unclear how the evaluation relates to the quality improvement initiative.
A general explanation for how the quality improvement initiative will be measured is summarized. The evaluation is generally appropriate to the quality improvement initiative.
An explanation for how the quality improvement initiative will be measured is presented. The evaluation is appropriate to the quality improvement initiative.
An explanation for how the quality improvement initiative will be measured is presented in detail. The evaluation is appropriate to the quality improvement initiative. Evaluation proposed is well supported.
Identification of Variables, Hypothesis Test, and Statistical Test
10.0
The variables, hypothesis, and statistical tests needed to prove the quality improvement succeeded are omitted.
The variables, hypothesis, and statistical tests needed to prove the quality improvement succeeded are partially presented; one is omitted. The proposed elements are not relevant to proving the quality improvement succeeded.
The variables, hypothesis, and statistical tests needed to prove the quality improvement succeeded are summarized. There are inaccuracies.
The variables, hypothesis, and statistical tests needed to prove the quality improvement succeeded are presented. Overall, the proposed elements are relevant to proving the quality improvement succeeded.
The variables, hypothesis, and statistical tests needed to prove the quality improvement succeeded are presented and accurate. The proposed elements will prove whether the quality improvement succeeded.
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Topic 4: Statistical Analysis
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5.0
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5.0
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Topic 4: Statistical Analysis
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new and apps.

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with MyCoursebay
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Database design and optimization
thanks for busting this out so expeditiously. I hope that I get a good grade.
Customer 452715, February 19th, 2022
Social Work and Human Services
Excellent Work!
Customer 452587, August 24th, 2021
Other
good
Customer 452813, June 30th, 2022
Marketing
Yes and thank you
Customer 452701, October 25th, 2022
Nursing
Paid for the paper to be completed 5 days prior than the day I received the paper.
Customer 452693, July 13th, 2022
Nursing
Thanks
Customer 452521, May 13th, 2021
Criminal Justice
Looks good! Thank you Jason
Customer 452711, January 25th, 2022
Criminal Justice
Excellent Work!!!
Customer 452587, March 10th, 2022
English 101
The paper was late. However, it was excellent quality.
Customer 452561, July 2nd, 2021
Technology
The paper is everything I needed and more. I will add a title and a cover page to it. Other than that the paper turned out excellent.
Customer 452885, October 17th, 2022
Social Work and Human Services
Thank You! Great Work!
Customer 452587, September 14th, 2021
Nursing
Everything was done thoroughly and with care. Awesome job!!!
Customer 452453, April 10th, 2021
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Get your perfect essay with a 15% discount. Use DC15

NEW

Thank you for choosing MyCoursebay. Your presence is a motivation to us. All papers are written from scratch. Plagiarism is not tolerated. Order now for a 15% discount

Order Now