English

In the character Cholly Breedlove, how does morrison create a character who is simultaneously fascinating and repellent

•Select a significant speech in consultation with Professor Steinberg.  Speeches may be selected from those addressed in Journals as approved by Steinberg.•Identify the components of the Rhetorical Situation (see article by Lloyd Bitzer in Course Documents) at related to the speech.•Describe and analyze relevant biographical details about the speaker (not, this may be discussed as part of the rhetorical situation or discussed as a separate section of paper.•Describe and analyze the speech including identification of rhetorical devices, organization, argumentation and proof and other interesting characteristics.  Include expert and witness responses as relevant and available.  This is the most important part of the paper, and likely the longest.•Evaluate the speech.  Why was it effective?  Was it a fitting response to the rhetorical situation?  Is there historical evidence of its effectiveness?•Use APA format.  I recommend the Purdue University Online Writing Lab materials for guidance.  For general rules, seehttps://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_style_introduction.html or look to the sample student paper at  https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/documents/APA%207%20Student%20Sample%20Paper.pdf•Attach the speech text as Appendix.•Reference a minimum of 5 cited sources.  These may be drawn from communication journals or books, scholarly historical literature, journalistic accounts, or other materials, but do consider the credibility and depth of sources referenced.  Do not reference Wikipedia (although that is often a good starting place for your own general reading).•Paper should be 1500 words of text.

The pros and cons of globalization in terms of economy, politics, sociocultural

Write a brief review on the book, “Make Your Home Among Strangers” by Jeanine Crucet. More so explain why it’s your favorite book. The purpose of this is to explain why you liked this book so much. Identify themes and main components to convince a reader why you liked this book.You can find a PDF version of the book online

The topic is the human aspects thatFrankenstein portrayed. Talk about how society treated him cruelly relate the issue to a time in history. Please use my source you may also add additional ones if you’d like.

Write an original story in which a character takes a risk or experiences a regret.

9.    Provide a close reading of Langston Hughes’s poem, “Daybreak in Alabama” (1967). Pay special attention to the style and form, the vocabulary, syntax and images. How do these formal or musical aspects contribute to the message that the poem aims to convey?

Please combine information on two websites, including two stories and 2 storied Microsoft document, to write an essay.The other document is showing how to write a literary analysis essay.Compare Poe’s stories “The Tell-Tale Heart” and “The Black Cat” as explorations of conscience.  How does conscience haunt the differently “diseased” narrators? Discuss the symbolism of the heart and of the cat. Focus on the psychology of the main characters and on how the conflict develops and is resolved in the stories. Do NOT spell conscience as “conscious.”https://www.poemuseum.org/the-tell-tale-hearthttps://poestories.com/read/blackcat

Write an 1,800–2,000 words (6-7 double spaced pages) long essay on one of the following topics:1. Hedonism is a major value theory we talked about in class. If you choose this topic, the thesis of your essay should be either that Hedonism is true, or that Hedonism is false. Whichever you choose, make sure to address at least one powerful objection to your thesis and defend the thesis from the objection(s).

TOPIC: essay needs to involve platos apology and philosophical view with the meaning of life.Method GuidelinesIn this assignment you will write an argument paper. In an argument paper you will asset a thesis. In your thesis you will take a stance either in favor of a position or against a position. You will support your position based in the readings of the course or readings that are directly related to readings and topics covered in the course.  You may defend you thesis in the following ways:1. provide a comparative examination of two or three different possible responses to your thesis and an explanation of why you have chosen to defend one position over the other 2. provide a critical analysis of your own position which identifies potential weaknesses in the position and explains what makes that position nevertheless superior in some ways to the others considered; and3. apply your thesis to an everyday situation, work of fiction or film to demonstrate the merit of your position.Style Guidelines1. The paper must be 5 pages long, typed, double-spaced, in an 11- or 12-point font with reasonable margins.2. The paper must be written in accord with the conventions of Standard Written English. Your paper will be evaluated in part in terms of spelling, grammar, and overall structure.3. You must use direct quotations from the readings assigned in class to support your claims about what the philosophers say and/or believe. Citations should be in either the MLA or Chicago Manual of Style formats (information on both of which is available on the UHD Library website, under the heading, “Citing Sources”), and as such must give full bibliographical information for your sources in either a “works cited” (MLA) or bibliographical footnotes (Chicago). Quotations should be set off from the rest of the paper (typically by quotation marks), and you must cite the page numbers in the relevant text where the quoted passage appears.4. Do not assume that the reader of your paper is familiar with what has been read or discussed in this class. Think of your reader as an educated person who, although they may be familiar with philosophy in general, is not necessarily knowledgeable of the texts (or topics) you are discussing in the paper. As such, you should make every effort to explain the ideas you discuss and the quotations you use in straightforward language that generally conveys meaning to your reader.5. You are responsible for ensuring that your paper is free of plagiarism. If you do not know what constitutes plagiarism, please consult the syllabus for this class, the UHD Student Handbook, the Academic Honesty Policy of the University of Houston-Downtown, and/or the UHD Library website (“Plagiarism: Understand and Avoid It!” in the section, “Citing Sources”) . If you are still uncertain, please contact the instructor with any specific questions you might have.